Search for: All records

Smell is one of the five senses we use to experience the world. It allows humans and other animals to find their food, avoid danger, and even recognize family members. Animals detect smells with olfactory receptors, special proteins that sit on the surface of the nose cells. These interact with odor molecules (small particles that have a smell) and send signals to the brain so the animal can perceive the smell. We know mammals have hundreds of olfactory receptors and can detect tens of thousands of smells, but what about birds? For decades, many people thought that birds did not use smell in their daily lives, but recent studies have shown that birds respond to smell. We show that many birds have a large number of olfactory receptors similar to mammals, strengthening the case for smell playing an important role in the life of birds. 

The rapid growth of open source software necessitates a deeper understanding of moderation and governance methods currently used within these projects. The code of conduct, a set of rules articulating standard behavior and responsibilities for participation within a community, is becoming an increasingly common policy document in open source software projects for setting project norms of behavior and discouraging negative or harassing comments and conversation. This study describes the conversations around adopting and crafting a code of conduct as well as those utilizing code of conduct for community governance. We conduct a qualitative analysis of a random sample of GitHub issues that involve the code of conduct. We find that codes of conduct are used both proactively and reactively to govern community behavior in project issues. Oftentimes, the initial addition of a code of conduct does not involve much community participation and input. However, a controversial moderation act is capable of inciting mass community feedback and backlash. Project maintainers balance the tension between disciplining potentially offensive forms of speech and encouraging broad and inclusive participation. These results have implications for the design of inclusive and effective governance practices for open source software communities.